OhForAGreavsie
On the Bench
- Messages
- 605
- Reaction score
- 347
Sorry, I'm fed up with this nonsense. How do you know what the board do or don't do? How on the face of this planet are you able to tell us the size of the picture they look at? You honestly believe the drivel you've written here?Sometimes, I think the negotiating team would do better if they took a look at transfers by stepping back a bit and look at the big picture. When the season ended, there were varying rumours of Sandro costing £52m. There was and will always be a price for each commodity and Juve asked that. But our negotiating team loves playing the bargain game for every player and what it accomplishes is introducing emotional factors into negotiations. They said 52 but we'll buy at 47 or whatever hypothetical number, to us it may seem like a good value but it antagonizes the selling club delaying the time needed for that club to look at replacements and negotiate other deals. Juve has a good scouting system, they'll know who to bring but in looking for bargains and steals, we delayed that negotiation.
They're all adults, they'll feel that we disrespected them because of the quality of the player and the importance of him to the team. The same issue when Arsenal bid 40m+1 for Suarez, the sheer audacity of it is what makes a selling club be turned off by that.
Your argument would work had we matched the fee said to be quoted in the first place. They'll have enquired it and a figure must have been quoted or else Juve won't be coming out with statements like "It's up to the player to decide or whatever", they'll say "We will not let him go" if they were really not considering the bid. Juve will sell if they match a price but they want to maintain their image as well but if our team went about it not being serious at all by bidding lower than the quoted fee, it makes the job of them rejecting it much easier. It's even worse now that City have inflated the market for fullbacks and with the time left and the poor showing our wingbacks had done in the pre-season, it only serves to give the selling club more power. They're not desperate to sell but they will and they have done that numerous times in the past all it takes is for us to approach them seriously and if they said no then that's it but this negotiating team doesn't seem to do that at all. We don't approach things seriously enough after a PL title win. Look at the summers of 2016 and 2014, the negotiating came in and paid the fee at the first time of asking for Kante, Fabregas, Diego Costa, Luiz and Alonso.
When push comes to shove, this negotiating team always crumble and just chuck money at it anyway so why bother dragging out negotiations for key areas in the first place?
And before you say Allegri came out and said Sandro is not for sale, Juve doesn't operate like that. What matters is what Agnelli and Marotta say in the matter or else Conte would still be a manager there.
So lets agree to disagree on this matter
The board know: -
- The manager's wishes.
- The owner's wishes.
- Who they have or have not bid for.
- Which of those players are, or are not, interested in joining.
- The precise response to any offers we've made
- Which of these offers has been conclusively rejected or withdrawn.
- The size of the budget at their disposal, and the reason it is set at that level.
- Of any future deals which may be in the pipeline, and which may influence decisions this summer.
- And many other pertinent details.
You know: -
And you want to measure the size of of the picture see against against the size of the one they look at? Funny.
As for your Arsenal example, I'm affraid you've just fallen for the heard mentality reaction, and, as so often, the heard view is stupid. You constantly argue that there is a price and that we should pay it. PSG were told of Neymar's buyout clause, they paid it. They didn't tell Barcelona that they wanted to avoid insulting them so they were offering an extra €5m just to be polite. When you buy your Pierre Cardin suits, you don't check the price and then offer them a couple of hundred more. Arsenal were told that bids in excess of £40m would trigger a clause so that's what they bid. It was the information given to them by Suarez's people which was duff, not the bid. They thought there was a price and offered to pay it. I'd have thought you'd have been praising them.
Last edited by a moderator:
