Alex Sandro

I really like Sandro but I can't help but feel if we are going to spend £60m on a player it should be in a position we actually need a player. And if this was going to be a wing-back I'd rather it be on the right hand side as it'd be very harsh to sign a replacement for him after such a good season.

 
Sandro is a great player, but it seems like an odd transfer to me.

We spend 25million on Alonso, who comes in, does a good job, only to be replaced by someone else for 60million the following year. Then all of a sudden we have two expensive LB's (in their prime age), vying for one spot. Sandro wins that battle, so Alonso is left on the bench.

Honestly, heading into this window, I thought any signings for the wing-backs would be a younger backup to Alonso, and maybe a first choice RWB to usurp Moses' spot.
Alonso is a good player who has exceeded expectations this season, but he is not world class like Sandro is. Personally, i am in favour of big squads with top class players competing against each other for their position, we need that to compete in the Champions League. 

 
Alonso is a good player who has exceeded expectations this season, but he is not world class like Sandro is. Personally, i am in favour of big squads with top class players competing against each other for their position, we need that to compete in the Champions League. 
We had 2 top players for almost every position during Mourinho's first spell, and for a few seasons after. We were such a strong side for a good few seasons. IMO we should have won the CL three times between 2005 and 2012. So for me Sandro is definitely the level of quality we should be recruiting.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apart from playing as a wingback for us, Sandro should be able to play at the left side of central midfield (Matic's role). A position we might need him as an emergency cover

 
Apart from playing as a wingback for us, Sandro should be able to play at the left side of central midfield (Matic's role). A position we might need him as an emergency cover
Alonso can also play as a central back so we get coverage from both left wing backs then.

 
Alonso is a good player who has exceeded expectations this season, but he is not world class like Sandro is. Personally, i am in favour of big squads with top class players competing against each other for their position, we need that to compete in the Champions League. 
I don't deny Sandro is a better player. I just feel as though to spend a club record fee on a player a single year after spending (pretty successfully) on that exact position should be limited to a scenario where the rest of the team is sorted. Priorities lie elsewhere, for me anyway.

That said, I would of course be excited if we sign him...because he's an outstanding player. It's not my money, if this is the way the club wants to go, I have no real course to complain.

 
I really like Sandro but I can't help but feel if we are going to spend £60m on a player it should be in a position we actually need a player. And if this was going to be a wing-back I'd rather it be on the right hand side as it'd be very harsh to sign a replacement for him after such a good season.
We do need a player at wingback, it's arguably the most crucial need for reinforcement after CM.

Firstly if we took one of Moses or Alonso out last season the team structure was off, secondly it's a hugely demanding position physically, Antonio always made an in game change there during the Euro's for Italy. Lastly (and most importantly) we need the option's to give us the chance to revert to a flat back four, Alonso and Moses can't do that, Sandro can.

Sandro and Alonso would be brilliant option's to have, we would be able to safely rest Sandro in CL group stage and before knockout ties safe in the knowledge Alonso would cover no problem.

 
I don't deny Sandro is a better player. I just feel as though to spend a club record fee on a player a single year after spending (pretty successfully) on that exact position should be limited to a scenario where the rest of the team is sorted. Priorities lie elsewhere, for me anyway.

That said, I would of course be excited if we sign him...because he's an outstanding player. It's not my money, if this is the way the club wants to go, I have no real course to complain.
We don't need to worry ourselves about overpaying for a player. One thing I know very well is that Abramovich is a shrewd business man he would be able to take care of the books well.

Chelsea needs world class players now to be able to compete favourably in the PL and CL. In today's market, everything seems to be insanely crazy. 

 
We do need a player at wingback, it's arguably the most crucial need for reinforcement after CM.

Firstly if we took one of Moses or Alonso out last season the team structure was off, secondly it's a hugely demanding position physically, Antonio always made an in game change there during the Euro's for Italy. Lastly (and most importantly) we need the option's to give us the chance to revert to a flat back four, Alonso and Moses can't do that, Sandro can.

Sandro and Alonso would be brilliant option's to have, we would be able to safely rest Sandro in CL group stage and before knockout ties safe in the knowledge Alonso would cover no problem.
Not disagreeing in the fact we need 'someone', however would we not be best placed to sign someone who's perhaps more of an up and coming LWB for half the price? Say Jose Gaya from Valencia, rather than splashing out £60m on someone who will effectively replace Alonso. Alonso has done more than enough to justify a starting position for next season, what sort of message would that give high performing Chelsea players knowing they'll be replaced at the drop of a hat?

 
I don't deny Sandro is a better player. I just feel as though to spend a club record fee on a player a single year after spending (pretty successfully) on that exact position should be limited to a scenario where the rest of the team is sorted. Priorities lie elsewhere, for me anyway.

That said, I would of course be excited if we sign him...because he's an outstanding player. It's not my money, if this is the way the club wants to go, I have no real course to complain.
I can certainly see your logic in looking to sign world class players for positions we need to prioritize. The problem is, signing world class players in general is a very difficult proposition and we've had our share of failings in this respect despite having plenty of money and top club prestige. So if we have a shot in hell of landing Alex Sandro, we should go for it, simple as that. Same for every other world class player we may land, whether they're a number one priority for the current squad or not. If Real Madrid's success teaches us anything is that you can never have too many world class footballers.

 
Alonso has been terrific for us last season but I'm not sure he has the quality to compete with the big boys in CL...sometimes you have to splash the cash for quality...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not disagreeing in the fact we need 'someone', however would we not be best placed to sign someone who's perhaps more of an up and coming LWB for half the price? Say Jose Gaya from Valencia, rather than splashing out £60m on someone who will effectively replace Alonso. Alonso has done more than enough to justify a starting position for next season, what sort of message would that give high performing Chelsea players knowing they'll be replaced at the drop of a hat?
I'd imagine it would be the same message that better players than Alonso are getting in clubs like Real or Bayern when someone even better starts ahead of them. If we prioritize players' feelings over team improvement, we won't get anywhere fast.

 
I can certainly see your logic in looking to sign world class players for positions we need to prioritize. The problem is, signing world class players in general is a very difficult proposition and we've had our share of failings in this respect despite having plenty of money and top club prestige. So if we have a shot in hell of landing Alex Sandro, we should go for it, simple as that. Same for every other world class player we may land, whether they're a number one priority for the current squad or not. If Real Madrid's success teaches us anything is that you can never have too many world class footballers.
Agree and how often do we get knocked back on other world class players, if you can buy one that strengthens the team it makes sense, providing he can gel with the dressing room.

 
Strikes me as just another case of a player being linked with us, before they get a new contract at their club.

 
Strikes me as just another case of a player being linked with us, before they get a new contract at their club.
I don't think that is the case here. Juve's president Marotti confirmed they turn a massive bid down from us. He is the last person I would think would want to fabricate stories of vast sums on offer to a player, who he is just about to enter contract negotiations with. 

 
Sorry guys but I can't agree that Alex Sandro is a 'bargain' at £55mil, for me I would much rather we spend the money on getting Bertrand back who would cost about half the price. Sandro is a little better but not 25mil better.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
if conte wants Sandro and we can afford it, then that's who we should be pursuing. Why push someone like bertrand in him, who would probably cost £35m+ himself judging by the priced being quoted for similar players. 

Would bertrand even want come back? He wouldn't be a clear 1st choice here anyway. Alonso is arguably the better player. 

Sandro is a quality player. The only players that I wouldn't actively look for upgrades for is Courtois, Azpi, Luiz, Kante, and Hazard. The rest have been great this season, but if we want to mix it with the best in europe, we must be looking improve the team. 

It's harsh, but true.

 
Not disagreeing in the fact we need 'someone', however would we not be best placed to sign someone who's perhaps more of an up and coming LWB for half the price? Say Jose Gaya from Valencia, rather than splashing out £60m on someone who will effectively replace Alonso. Alonso has done more than enough to justify a starting position for next season, what sort of message would that give high performing Chelsea players knowing they'll be replaced at the drop of a hat?
Pedro has had a fantastic season for us. If we got a chance to sign Sanchez to play in that position would you say we sign some up and coming forward rather than a world class player just to massage Pedro's ego? I'm sure he knows he'll absolutely sit on the bench for a Sanchez type. You say it like Alonso is some important superstar. We basically increased the profile of his career 10 fold by signing him. You're actually sending the wrong message to the best players on the team like Hazard, Courtois and Cesc by NOT signing the best players you can to help win the CL.

 
if conte wants Sandro and we can afford it, then that's who we should be pursuing. Why push someone like bertrand in him, who would probably cost £35m+ himself judging by the priced being quoted for similar players. 

Would bertrand even want come back? He wouldn't be a clear 1st choice here anyway. Alonso is arguably the better player. 

Sandro is a quality player. The only players that I wouldn't actively look for upgrades for is Courtois, Azpi, Luiz, Kante, and Hazard. The rest have been great this season, but if we want to mix it with the best in europe, we must be looking improve the team. 

It's harsh, but true.
In Conte's words, cold hard decision but necessary.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry guys but I can't agree that Alex Sandro is a 'bargain' at £55mil, for me I would much rather we spend the money on getting Bertrand back who would cost about half the price. Sandro is a little better but not 25mil better.
If we're actually making bids for Sandro (which we clearly are) then it's obvious we can afford him along with our other targets even at that price. So why are you complaining? Never seen so many fans say no to world class talent before.

 
Back
Top