OhForAGreavsie
On the Bench
- Messages
- 605
- Reaction score
- 347
OK, we're just using different definitions of 'open to' but I think we agree on where Juve stand.So short of threatening to report clubs to FIFA means they are quite open to selling. Jesus you guys are seeing what you want. Im sure Bayern would sell Lewa if he refused to play for them as well, that's normal in today's world. We'd consider 100m for Hazard especially if he wants to go but that doesn't mean we're open to selling him does it? I've been saying this since the beginning, Sandro will need to push for this move. That's the easiest way for it to happen and again we look like we're about to find ourselves at a disadvantage in a prolonged transfer negotiation.
Maybe I'm out of the loop but does the player want to leave Juventus? What's more, does he want to come here if he does? They have no intent to sell, they don't need to sell and it looks like he's perfectly happy there. Time to move on to Plan B. At a certain point it's not worth the time or money to keep this up, that's economics. We could buy Aubameyang for 70m for Christ's sake
If I've understood you correctly, you take 'open' to mean actively looking to sell. Well, as far as any of us know, you're correct about that, Juve are not actively looking to sell. They are however prepared to do so under the right circumstances, and that is how I interpret the phrase, 'open to'.
For example, when Wenger says he would prefer to allow xyz player to run down his contract than to sell him, that's what I call not open to selling. Of course whether we should believe Wenger when he says that is another matter. Clubs have shown in the past that they can resist a player's determination to leave but it's a risk. On the whole, Juve's attitude seems sensible.
Last edited by a moderator: