Brazil 1982: the most gifted but ultimately flawed midfield in history

The next stage saw Brazil in what everyone popularly called “the group of death”, including an out-of-sorts Argentina who were still preoccupied with the Falklands War and the over-expectation around Maradona, who was looking to move to Europe after the World Cup. And then there was Italy, who had laboured, uninspiringly, through their group with draws against Poland, Peru and Cameroon.

Brazil had charmed their way through the competition, along with a French side that had overcome a defeat in their first game and included the gifted Michel Platini. If football was to be the winner, the final should have been between these two countries.

Brazil beat a fractious Argentina 3-1, a game that ended with Maradona receiving a red card for a foolish attack on Batista. Argentina had already been beaten 2-1 by Italy, so they were out and this meant a draw would be enough for Brazil to reach the semi-finals, and they were favourites.

Italy, however, had a secret weapon simmering away in Paolo Rossi, the 25 year-old Juventus striker who had only just returned from a two-year ban due to his involvement in the Totonero betting scandal. Rossi, like Italy, had failed to make an impact in the first group stage. Against Argentina, he was subbed for the second time in the competition with 10 minutes to go. Rossi’s ability prior to his ban was unquestioned, but the decision to take him to Spain was controversial. Against Brazil, he would silence the critics and enjoy his finest hour.

Rossi opened the scoring after five minutes, a header on the run from Cabrini’s cross to the far post. Socrates levelled on 12 minutes after a good interchange with Zico, but Rossi made it 2-1 after 25, capitalising on a defensive error by Cerezo. It took Brazil 43 minutes to equalise, Falcão netting with another outstanding goal. At this point, Brazil were through to the last four, but they continued to spurn pragmatism and go in pursuit of more goals. With 15 minutes to go, Marco Tardelli played the ball into the area and Rossi turned it home to put Italy ahead and complete his hat-trick. Brazil were behind, and on the brink of elimination. They pressed, they twisted and turned, but the Italian defence refused to yield and prevented their key man, Zico from playing his usual game. There was a sense of disbelief that the overwhelming favourites, the team that had restored faith in the Brazilian ethos of beautiful football, had been knocked out.




Brazil’s Socrates (r) fires home the equalising goal despite the attempts of Italy’s Gaetan Scirea (c) and goalkeeper Dino Zoff (l)



Death in Barcelona

Italy and Rossi went on to win the competition and Brazil went home, returning as heroes, despite blowing their chance of glory. An embittered Zico, who would also win South American Player of the Year in 1982, commented that “this was the day football died”.

In hindsight, it probably was the end of something special. Brazil’s traditional methods had been beaten by a resilient but unexceptional Italian side. Their last three European competitions had all ended in anti-climax – 1966 in England when Pelé vowed “never again; 1974 in West Germany when the Dutch made it clear, football had moved on; and now in Spain when an inferior team had deprived them of success.

By the time 1986 came around, Brazil still had some of the 82 squad, but they went out of the Mexico-hosted competition in the quarter-finals, and they were, after all, four years older. Desperate to win the World Cup again – each passing competition would provide a reminder, “it’s 20 years since…” –  but questioning their own approach, they finally did it in 1994 in the US with a team that had very little in common with the heritage of the nation’s football. And unsatisfyingly, they did it on penalties after a dire game with old foes Italy.

The 1982 team really was the last flickers of the eternal flame that was lit as far back as the 1950s, when artistry and guile were staples of the Brazilian game. We still long to be stimulated by Brazilian skill, but we are ito often let down, even though footballers are made and nurtured in South America’s biggest nation. What is missing today is the spirit that gave us Garrincha, Pelé, Jairzinho, Ronaldo, Romario, Socrates, Falcão, Éder and Zico. Will it ever return?

@GameofthePeople

 
Team

The World Cup qualifying competition was easily handled by Santana’s team, four straight wins against Venezuela and Bolivia, 11 goals scored, one conceded. It was the summer tour of 1981 that really acted as a curtain-raiser for Spain 1982 and the impressive results prompted the media to pronounce Brazil as favourites for the World Cup. Brazil played four games, against England, France, West Germany and Spain – all of whom would appear in World Cup 1982.

In the build-up to virtually every World Cup, the state of Brazil’s team would be the source of great speculation. There was often a degree of kidology involved in order to temper expectation, but as 1981 became 1982, people were talking about the current seleçâo as the best since the days of Pelé.

The squad for Spain included two players who had featured in 1974, goalkeeper Peres and midfielder Dirceu. Zico was 25 when he became known to the world in 1978 and Cerezo and Oscar had also featured in the squad for Argentina. The public image of the squad was that it was harmonious and “together”, but apparently, there was some friction between the players of Atlético Mineiro and Flamengo. This may have been triggered by the 1981 Copa Libertadores meetings between the two clubs, which both ended in 2-2 draws. A play-off followed and Atlético had five men sent off. Flamengo went on to win the competition, the only time they have lifted South America’s premier club competition.

The Brazilian squad was evenly spread across Brazilian football, with Flamengo providing three key players: Zico, Leandro and Júnior. Zico had been named South American Footballer of the Year in 1981, pushing the 1979 and 1980 winner Maradona into second position. While the Argentinian had been getting the headlines and Zico was still relatively unknown outside his native Brazil, the 1982 World Cup was seen as the theatre to provide affirmation for both players. With Zico 29 years old, it was arguably his last chance to impress the global audience.

Brazil’s captain, and to a large degree, the face of 1982, was not Zico, though. That honour fell to Socrates, a heavy smoker, a drinker and a bedraggled, messianic figure. Socrates was political, outspoken and the most unlikely looking footballer. But his presence and his ability epitomised the team of 1982. He played for Corinthians and specialised in delicate back-heels, as well as political statements, including the time he told the people of Brazil that he would never leave the country to play football elsewhere if the government implemented free elections. They didn’t and he left, somewhat reluctantly, to play for Fiorentina.

Zico and Socrates formed part of a midfield quartet that looked las though it was playing for fun. They passed the ball with a touch of fantasy in their boots, finding space and men with accuracy and invention. Falcão was 27 at the time and playing in Italy with Roma. He was a deep-lying playmaker with the ability to score spectacular long-range goals. Complementing Falcão was the workhorse of the midfield, the wafer-thin and lanky Toninho Cerezo of Atlético Mineiro.

Not for the first time in history, Brazil’s team of supreme talents had its soft underbelly. On this occasion it was the goalkeeper, Waldir Peres, who had been included in World Cup squads since 1974. Peres was much-maligned, mostly because of an early mistake in the World Cup when he allowed the USSR to take the lead in Brazil’s opening match. The Brazil side of 1970 was also said to have a weak keeper, but like his predecessors, Peres didn’t let too many goals. Similarly, Brazil 1982 had a less celebrated centre forward in the muscular and one-dimensional Serginho, who still managed to score twice in the competition.

The people of Brazil loved the 1982 team because it revived memories of the fluid, creative style of the past, the approach that had won three World Cups between 1958 and 1970. It included the best player from the main football states: Minas Gerais (Cerezo), Rio Grande do Sul (Isidoro), Rio de Janeiro (Zico) and São Paulo (Socrates).  In many ways, it was a team for one tournament, though. Zico was 29, Socrates, Falcão and Serginho 28, Cerezo, Oscar and Luzinho 27.

Brazil team group. (top l-r) Waldir Perez, Leandro, Oscar, Falcao, Luizinho, Junior. (front l-r) Trainer, Socrates, Cerezo, Serginho, Zico, Eder.

Spain

Brazil began the group stage with a 2-1 victory against the Soviets, who had taken the lead thanks to a slip-up by Peres. If that confirmed the pre-competition analysis of Brazil’s weak spots, the two goals that turned the game around rubber-stamped the team as being packed with star quality, the strikes from Socrates and Éder both spectacular efforts.

Outstanding goals became a feature of Brazil’s 1982 campaign, if they were not great finishes, they were well crafted. Scotland took the lead against Santana’s men but were made to pay, with wonderful efforts from Zico, Éder and Falcão. New Zealand were also beaten by four, with Zico running riot.
I nearly played against Socrates. In 87-88 spent a season with Corinthian Casuals. Summer 88 was the centenary of the forming of Corinthians São Paulo. They flew the squad out for 10 days, the high point being a friendly before the main kick off between Casuals and a Corinthians old boys team including Socrates.

No one could get near him by all accounts.

Wasnt allowed to go owing to the fact I had their worst single season disciplinary record ever. Gutted, however most of me team mates caught a dose out there, so maybe for the best.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ewell: Cheers mate. That would have been some experience had you played against him.

I remember Graeme Souness saying that both Socrates and Zico, strolled through that 4-1 game v Scotland in the 1982 World Cup.

 
That got me interested in watching Italy beat them. Only the highlights yet the Italians looked like they were working much harder




 
5 hours ago, Strider6003 said:

That got me interested in watching Italy beat them. Only the highlights yet the Italians looked like they were working much harder


Might just be that Brazilian team's style. Strolling through a game.

Italy really did hit a great peak in that tournament to be fair.

 
On 01/06/2018 at 10:04, Boyne said:

Agree, that was a great Brazil team. A joy to watch. Other highlights for me were David Narey's goal for Scotland against Brazil. Scotland went 1-0 up but Brazil ended up winning 4-1 and Marco Tardelli's celebration after scoring. One of the all time great celebrations.


Bit OTT if you ask me. Anyone would think he’s just scored the winning goal in the World Cup Final!

 
The 1982 Brazil team is, for my money's worth, one of the greatest and most beautiful football teams of all time. Up there with 1995 A**x for me. The 1992 Sao Paulo team, also coached by Tele Santana, is a strong contender as well. Another team that probably doesn't get talked about a lot is the 1991 Red Star Belgrade team.

 
The 1982 Brazil team is, for my money's worth, one of the greatest and most beautiful football teams of all time. Up there with 1995 A**x for me. The 1992 Sao Paulo team, also coached by Tele Santana, is a strong contender as well. Another team that probably doesn't get talked about a lot is the 1991 Red Star Belgrade team.
The Red Star Belgrade of 1990/91 were some team. They simply tore apart Glasgow Rangers in European Cup. 2nd Round 1st leg.

It was 3-0 honestly going on 7 in Belgrade . They were that good. .

 
The Red Star Belgrade of 1990/91 were some team. They simply tore apart Glasgow Rangers in European Cup. 2nd Round 1st leg.

It was 3-0 honestly going on 7 in Belgrade . They were that good. .
The talent on that team was remarkable, and is a testament to just how good the Yugoslavian talent pipeline was. Pancev, Savicevic, Prosinecki, Mihajolvic, Jugovic....and that was after they sold Stojkovic year before. One of the greatest what if stories in football is how many titles Yugoslavia would have won in the international scene if they didn't break up right in the middle of their golden generation.

 
The talent on that team was remarkable, and is a testament to just how good the Yugoslavian talent pipeline was. Pancev, Savicevic, Prosinecki, Mihajolvic, Jugovic....and that was after they sold Stojkovic year before. One of the greatest what if stories in football is how many titles Yugoslavia would have won in the international scene if they didn't break up right in the middle of their golden generation.
Totally agree.

Indeed they were an outstanding team and a great football   'What if ?'

 
Haven’t seen anything ‘Scotland World Cup 2024’ in any of the supermarkets yet! I’m sure there will be soon.

 
image.png

Zico about to equalise with ‘that free kick’ against Scotland in 1982 World Cup.

 
Back
Top