It's the same reason why Tomori is loaned out, making space for T.Silva.Someone correct me if I’m wrong...but I find it hard to believe that someone that we signed on a free transfer who will be immediately loaned out - is someone who is highly rated.
Surely he’s just loan fodder?
Everyone likes to go back to the start of the thread a couple of years later and see what people thought of them before they signed.I think its better to start fresh with a new thread. No point moving a thread over when its full of posts from before they were Chelsea players.
Did the same with De bruyne and Courtois.Someone correct me if I’m wrong...but I find it hard to believe that someone that we signed on a free transfer who will be immediately loaned out - is someone who is highly rated.
Surely he’s just loan fodder?
Agree. It would have been interesting pairing him with Silva as that would have been worth more than any experience he could get out on loan. He's already so highly rated and has games under his belt, plus didn't Frank say that age doesn't matter as long as you show something you will be picked? We needed defensive reinforcements, we got them, and now we are sending one straight out on loan without having a proper look at him first. It's a bit strange tbh.If this young lad has already played a 100 league games, why oh why is he going out to get game time, he hardly needs to learn how to play.
What is the point then if he doesn't get minutes?A year loan seems to be pointless, considering how short we are in quality, and the guy is hardly a rookie. one logic is to give him a taste of EPL before we throw him into the spot light, but you want the guy to be around and learn to play with the team, even he's only playing once a fortnight.
Probably because Frank has realized there's only so many new players you can put in in one go. A Silva Sarr partnership alongside our other new recruits we'd be looking at our preferred Xl having 7 new players in it, it's too much.Agree. It would have been interesting pairing him with Silva as that would have been worth more than any experience he could get out on loan. He's already so highly rated and has games under his belt, plus didn't Frank say that age doesn't matter as long as you show something you will be picked? We needed defensive reinforcements, we got them, and now we are sending one straight out on loan without having a proper look at him first. It's a bit strange tbh.
Loaning him to Leverkusen seems like the right and better choice.I have a feeling he will go to Leicester. They were tracking him and made attempts to sign him.
Maybe a sweetener as part of the Chilwell deal? I’d be pissed off if I was a Leicester fan and that happened though. Giving PL experience to improve a rival’s team.
I wouldn't read too much into that ... Bats has already gone on loan and Gilmour has now taken the #23 shirt.Ok, so if Tomori and Ampadu are both (supposedly) and (actually) going on loan, doesn't it seem foolish to let Sarr go on loan also? I've not seen his loan mentioned, and then today when teh squad numbers were announced I don't think he was on the list.
But Tomori and Bats were!?
yeah they updated the list now that Bats is off. Just wondering what the plans are. I think we need more than 4 given Thiago is new and we will be plaing a lot of games this yearI wouldn't read too much into that ... Bats has already gone on loan and Gilmour has now taken the #23 shirt.
If Tomori and Sarr both go on loan, we would still have 4 centre backs (Silva, Christensen, Zouma, Rudiger)
Wasn't Sarr loaned out to Leverkusen?Ok, so if Tomori and Ampadu are both (supposedly) and (actually) going on loan, doesn't it seem foolish to let Sarr go on loan also? I've not seen his loan mentioned, and then today when teh squad numbers were announced I don't think he was on the list.
But Tomori and Bats were!?