Gordon Bennett
First Team Regular
- Messages
- 3,555
- Reaction score
- 3,332
Analysis from FourFourTwo:
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Never big fan of analysis from 442.Analysis from FourFourTwo:
Thoughts?
Clickbait video, the same bloke claimed these same tactics would dominate the Premier League about 8 weeks earlier and now his main thesis is that injuries to Fofana and Jackson have ruined everything?Analysis from FourFourTwo:
Thoughts?
And apparently the board are "delighted" with him and won't be conducting an in depth "Pochettino-style" review until Summer 2026 !So the closer we play to Enzo's system the worst our results have become? Oh deary me.
It was this system that I was dreading that we would be playing, but I was delighted that it was the complete opposite. Now it looks like the system that Leicester fans warned us about, slow, ponderous, dull, and hard to enjoy .I was full of praise for our exciting football, but it seems that wasn't actually what Enzo wanted !So the closer we play to Enzo's system the worst our results have become? Oh deary me.
I think they are bang on. It's a style of football I have never warmed to, even when Barcelona were doing it and being called the greatest team of all time. It's Messi that I enjoyed watching, but Xavi, Busquets, even Iniesta who could be as brilliant as Messi at times, it bored the life out of me.The Athletic podcast had a different take. It's worth a look on their YouTube channel.
Their opinion was that we are actually now playing the system and the way Maresca wants us to play...slow, controlled ,possession based football . The adventurous , uncontrolled, risky football ( that we loved) was something he said he didn't want. " We don't want basketball games". He was concerned about our inability to control games, as SydneyChelsea in his post says.
Not only is it not working, they said that in general Chelsea fans don't like this way of playing and referenced our dislike of Sarri ball.
They did say though, that if it was actually successful then we would be more inclined to accept it. No surprise there ! It makes sense to me at least, dunno what others think ?
Yes.To summarise then, the longer Maresca has spent with the players and the more his system is implemented the worse we’ve got?
Agreed Scott. And I reckon football has moved on from the slow possession based style anyway. Trust us to try and impose it on the team just as it goes out of fashion!I think they are bang on. It's a style of football I have never warmed to, even when Barcelona were doing it and being called the greatest team of all time. It's Messi that I enjoyed watching, but Xavi, Busquets, even Iniesta who could be as brilliant as Messi at times, it bored the life out of me.
At our best and most successful period in our history, we were the opposite to this kind of football, we were it's foil. Strong defence, strong midfield, counter attacking, a threat from set pieces, we were the best at it for nearly 15 years. We ruined Arsenal and Wenger, we were by far the team Barcelona hated playing against the most, then Sarri came in and it all changed. The football is boring, the fans are bored in the stadium, the fans are bored at home, the players look like they are sleep walking. It's quite simply not the Chelsea way.
442 analysis is mostly meh.I kind of like the fourfourtwo videos.
I thought this one in particular at the end of last season was very good at summing up our strengths and deficiencies under Pochettino
While I still think sacking Poch was a mistake (at least with the benefit of the hindsight we have now), this absolutely influenced my thinking at the time.
Our lack of a keeper and at least 1 clinical striker destroys any formation or tactical set up Maresca plays.The Athletic podcast had a different take. It's worth a look on their YouTube channel.
Their opinion was that we are actually now playing the system and the way Maresca wants us to play...slow, controlled ,possession based football . The adventurous , uncontrolled, risky football ( that we loved) was something he said he didn't want. " We don't want basketball games". He was concerned about our inability to control games, as SydneyChelsea in his post says.
Not only is it not working, they said that in general Chelsea fans don't like this way of playing and referenced our dislike of Sarri ball.
They did say though, that if it was actually successful then we would be more inclined to accept it. No surprise there ! It makes sense to me at least, dunno what others think ?