What's new

Achraf Hakimi

axman2526 said:
And yet we are supposed to believe we will do even more ridiculous agent fees and wages for Haaland lmao.
Click to expand...
I’d like to think Haaland would justify it in comparison, with his profile and importance to a side but yea maybe that’s just wishful thinking.

 
His name popped up on livescore.com as a potential new Wing Back despite him being in PSG.

https://www.livescore.com/en/news/transfer-talk-thomas-tuchel-recce-james-chelsea-west-ham-premier-league-preview-2022042110245943222/

1650536603141.png


Also Livramento

1650536662140.png


 
Jangz said:
i couldnt agree more..i will be very glad if we dont sign him.. We have Livramento coming through who is ready to start giving contribution to Azpi and Reece. I would rather see this money invested in a striker and a defensive mid.. 
Click to expand...
How about that striker we invested in lol?

 
Evenflow20 said:
How about that striker we invested in lol?
Click to expand...
Are you trying to troll yourself? This guy would have cost us 70mil .. unsettled Reece.. A guy who has 4 assists in 32 matches in the french league..  we still didnt buy a DM .. lukaku can still turn around but glad we didnt blow 70 mil on hakimi

 
Jangz said:
Are you trying to troll yourself? This guy would have cost us 70mil .. unsettled Reece.. A guy who has 4 assists in 32 matches in the french league..  we still didnt buy a DM .. lukaku can still turn around but glad we didnt blow 70 mil on hakimi
Click to expand...
I'd rather see Hakimi up front for us than see 1 more ball cannon off fat Roms shins.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Oli
Jangz said:
Are you trying to troll yourself? This guy would have cost us 70mil .. unsettled Reece.. A guy who has 4 assists in 32 matches in the french league..  we still didnt buy a DM .. lukaku can still turn around but glad we didnt blow 70 mil on hakimi
Click to expand...
See comment below

 
HazardousChoice said:
I'd rather see Hakimi up front for us than see 1 more ball cannon off fat Roms shins.
Click to expand...
Two wrongs don’t make a right .. yes lukaku didn’t work out like we hoped but signing a back wb for 70 mil does not look sensible..

 
I think the rumour of Hakimi is fake. There is no way we are interested in him or he wants to move team. 

Perfectly happy with Reece and next year he would have developed even further. 

 
Gentian said:
I think the rumour of Hakimi is fake. There is no way we are interested in him or he wants to move team. 

Perfectly happy with Reece and next year he would have developed even further. 
Click to expand...
I was really keen last summer as I didn't think Reece was top class at wingback (I still don't as a hug the touchline one but Tuchel's change to inverted wingbacks has been a massive gamechanger).

But now yeah there's no need for a marquee one but we certainly need quality cover/competition for both Reece and Chilwell. The thought of rolling into next season with Emerson and Sterling as the back ups is beyond depressing.

 
CandyWarol said:
Hakimi is almost the right type of player, but no thank you.
Click to expand...
To me it seems like you're viewing each and every black player we're linked with as "not the right type of player". Couple that with the predicted 11 you gave and it was exclusively white and they were "exactly the right type of player for us". 

Why exactly are these black players not the right type of player for us? 

 
If the idea is to bring him in so Reece James can play CB then f**k that.

 
drjonesy1994 said:
To me it seems like you're viewing each and every black player we're linked with as "not the right type of player". Couple that with the predicted 11 you gave and it was exclusively white and they were "exactly the right type of player for us". 

Why exactly are these black players not the right type of player for us? 
Click to expand...
Really? Making allegations of racism is not cool...

 
nonotnowjim said:
Really? Making allegations of racism is not cool...
Click to expand...
Check his post history mate. Every black player linked with us is “not the right type of player for us” with no explanation as to what that means. Happy to be wrong but definitely reeks of racist undertones. 

 
Argo said:
I was really keen last summer as I didn't think Reece was top class at wingback (I still don't as a hug the touchline one but Tuchel's change to inverted wingbacks has been a massive gamechanger).

But now yeah there's no need for a marquee one but we certainly need quality cover/competition for both Reece and Chilwell. The thought of rolling into next season with Emerson and Sterling as the back ups is beyond depressing.
Click to expand...
Don't get me wrong i wanted Hakimi too last season, and would still be delighted if we signed him as i think he is world class but we have more concerning positions to sort out like a decent attacker, 2 decent central defenders and a quality midfielder. 

I don't agree though about reece and chillwell back ups, i don't think we have that luxury to spend so much of our funds on wing backs, we are not city. I do think that sterling, emerson, possibly, loftus cheek and hudson odoi are more than good enough to help with the wing back positions.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top