Valerie
Only one 23
- Messages
- 35,250
- Reaction score
- 22,175

Stakes lacking perhaps, I did at least enjoy the name-dropping. I have since purchased the collected works of Dorothy Parker. She, and all of us, have benefited from the fight against censorship that Cole was such an ardent part of. Now that we no longer clutch our pearls at the glimpse of stocking, God knows that anything goes!"(...) the story suffered from insufficient dramatic incident and conflict. Apart from Cole's fabulous accomplishment, the only dramatic thing that ever happened to him was the horrible accident in which he was thrown from a horse.
"He was phenomenally gifted, and very rich, he had an indescribably beautiful wife, his name was the proverbial household word and celebrated people the world over sought his companionship. He and I both knew that these were not quite elements of great story-making. But we also knew that fictionalizing (sic) was out of the question. Audiences wanted to meet the real Cole Porter. So we settled for the truth.
It’s a great read. Very informative and interesting across the whole War.Found this book in a second-hand bookshop in Faversham earlier today. Looking forward to reading it. RV Jones was one of the great scientific minds of WW2.
![]()
Cheers. Only cost £3. A bargain. I love second-hand bookshops. You never know what you'll find.It’s a great read. Very informative and interesting across the whole War.
He didn’t give Sir Keith Park any credit what so ever, for Park’s brilliant air defence of Malta. I know there were family politics involved, as he was related to Douglas Bader. But still…View attachment 38802
Five Up: A Chronicle of Five LivesIn World War II Laddie Lucas became famous as a legendary fighter ace, and at the age of just twenty-six led the top-scoring 249 Squadron during the Battle of Malta. Later he commanded a Spitfire wing and led a Mosquito squadron operating in support of the Allied armies advancing through Europe. Before that he had achieved international honors on the golf circuit and had carved out a successful career as a Fleet Street journalist. Following the end of the war he served as a Conservative MP for nine years and later wrote numerous bestselling books based on his exemplary war service.
Next up. This book, came across it yesterday when looking for another book!


A shame that family politics stopped Park receiving the credit he deserved. I think that we've all probably worked with people we didn't get on with but paid credit where it was due.He didn’t give Sir Keith Park any credit what so ever, for Park’s brilliant air defence of Malta. I know there were family politics involved, as he was related to Douglas Bader. But still…
Finished this book the other day. A very good overview of the period 1292 to 1492, There are plenty of books which give more in-depth accounts of people e.g. Henry V and battles e.g. Poitiers but as already mentioned the book gives a good overview and mostly covers the area from a French viewpoint and France's relationship with not only England but also neighbouring provinces e.g. Burgundy and Brittany and also Spain and Scotland. The book starts with how the relationship - good and bad - between France and England started i.e. just before the Norman Conquest and through the reigns of English Kings from William the Bastard or Conqueror to Edward I.F
I'm about a quarter of the book and have learned a lot already about the era. Before the author commences his argument why the 200 Hundred Years War started in 1292 with battles between French and English naval merchantmen - or should that be pirates - Livingston covers what had happened in England and France in the preceding centuries e.g. the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 and the allocation of lands in England and Normandy to his sons and the subsequent addition of lands to Henry II by marriage and conquest. At the same French Kings were trying to build France by conquest, homage and treaties. I'm looking forward to reading the rest of the book.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Two-Hundred-Years-War-1292-1492/dp/1035906368/ref=asc_df_1035906368?tag=bingshoppinga-21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80608152478256&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=182495&hvtargid=pla-4584207614700513&psc=1&msclkid=1c129af3724110499909f370476ed131
A new and radically original account of the longest military conflict in European history, which challenges the conventional periodisation of the 'Hundred Years War' to consider a much longer period of Anglo-French conflict.
Michael Livingston argues that the English lens through which the war has been viewed has led historians to define it in terms of English interests (most famously, the claim of the English Plantagenet king Edward III to be the rightful king of France), and that the events collectively labelled the 'Hundred Years War' are best seen as a sequence of steps in France's struggle to define itself as a nation. For much of the period, France's primary rival was indeed England. But it was by no means the only combatant. Burgundy stood in its way, too, as did Brittany, Flanders, Navarre and other rival powers.
Viewing France as the primary engine driving the war leads Livingston to consider a much longer timespan, starting with the Anglo-French 'Pirate War' of 1292 (which swiftly escalated into a fight over England's feudal possessions in Gascony) and ending with the marriage of Charles VIII of France to Anne of Brittany by which Brittany was subsumed into the French realm.


Post it to me, first class.View attachment 39075
Finished ‘The English & Their History’ by Robert Tombs recently after going back to it over the past few weeks.
Fascinating look at the development of the country over the centuries. Would be nice to say we’ve come a long way but…
If anyone wants the copy I’m happy to post it out as I don’t have space on the bookshelf, just drop us a message.
There aren’t that many pictures in it. Will you be OK?Post it to me, first class.