Our most successful player and captain getting a stand named after him ? I can't think of anyone more deserving.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4476340/Chelsea-fans-launch-petition-new-John-Terry-Stand.html
Personally not in favour. Am however still annoyed that the East Stand hasn't been named the Lord Attenborough Stand.
Well I would argue Matthew Harding and Lord Attenborough are more deserving. Without their support for the club there wouldn't have been a JT. They dedicated their lives to Chelsea through a number of dark times and gave to the club a lot more than they received. JT is a player, paid handsomely, to deliver on and off the pitch. Without being paid that much money - the highest paid in the league for a defender - he would have left. He has made no actual sacrifices for the club.Our most successful player and captain getting a stand named after him ? I can't think of anyone more deserving.
You'd think with that sort of money offered, it's a team in the top half of the table at least.Supposedly JT has an offer of £5m signing on bonus and £100K a week from a PL club for next year ... plus an option in China ... not bad options for a career swansong.
It will be strange, but we were dreading a future without Lampard and we have managed just fine.It's going to be strange not having JT at the club next season.
These substitute cameos are very bittersweet. How does a club move on from a player that defines their club?
The Munich Stand.Love JT to bits but I just can't accept having a stand named after him without thinking about DD and Super Frank. I honestly can't pick the 3 apart and all are just as deserving as eachother. If anything, a stand should be named after Roman.
On the pitch we already have, off the pitch I'm sure we've been putting the groundwork in. JT has been pivotal behind the scenes and others will have to take up that leadership mantle, but the organisational culture of the club should sustain itself, especially with a figure as influential as Conte at the helm.It's going to be strange not having JT at the club next season.
These substitute cameos are very bittersweet. How does a club move on from a player that defines their club?
100% agree. Stands should honour club heritage, not players. Stevie G cringeworthy.Well I would argue Matthew Harding and Lord Attenborough are more deserving. Without their support for the club there wouldn't have been a JT. They dedicated their lives to Chelsea through a number of dark times and gave to the club a lot more than they received. JT is a player, paid handsomely, to deliver on and off the pitch. Without being paid that much money - the highest paid in the league for a defender - he would have left. He has made no actual sacrifices for the club.
If he dedicates the next 10+ years as an ambassador for the club then I will change my mind. But as he is going to go off to another club, potentially then move into media or managing other teams, then I would suggest we wait.
Imagine if in 10-15 years time he is the manager of Tottenham or United...what do we do then? Change the name back? Do you actually suggest that is 100% not going to happen? We don't know what his next career will be in football.
None of this intended to be a slur on JT, he is the GOAT for Chelsea and has been an incredible captain who is responsible for a number of trophies, he is a legend. But lets just wait and see what he does for the rest of his adult life first before making him officially marking him as an equal with MH.